logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog

Monthly Archives: February 2020

FEMA Public Assistance Appeal: Debris Removal – Support Documentation

FEMA Public Assistance Appeal: Debris Removal – Support Documentation

PA ID# 153-03950-00; City of Bellevue

Conclusion: The Applicant did not document its work such that FEMA can separate the costs of eligible work along the improved trail from the ineligible debris removal performed in Lot 473.  Accordingly, the appeal is denied.

Headnote 1: 44 C.F.R. § 206.224 permits Public Assistance funding for debris removal when it is necessary to: 1) eliminate immediate threats to life, public health, and safety, or 2) eliminate immediate threats of significant damage to improved public or private property.  Debris removal from natural, unimproved land, such as heavily wooded areas and unused areas, is not eligible. The Applicant removed all vegetation from Lot 473.  The Applicant’s work removing hanging limbs and trees leaning over the improved Daniel Trail is potentially eligible, but its documentation does not distinguish between this eligible work and ineligible work removing debris from unimproved areas of Lot 473.  Therefore, because FEMA cannot distinguish between eligible and ineligible work, FEMA cannot fund the debris removal work in Lot 473.

Link: https://www.fema.gov/appeal/356206

FEMA Public Assistance Appeal: Debris Removal-Private Property and Legal Responsibility-Private Entity

PA ID# 013-UVZOO-00; Blackhawk Geologic Hazard Abatement District 

Date of Appeal: January 10, 2020

Conclusion: The Applicant does not have the legal responsibility to perform the work.  The Applicant also failed to obtain prior approval from FEMA for private property debris removal.  Additionally, the work performed does not meet eligibility requirements for emergency protective measures on private property.  Accordingly, the Applicant’s second appeal is denied.

Headnote 1: Section 407 of the Stafford Act authorizes FEMA to fund the removal of debris from private property, if specific criteria and requirements are met, including pre-approval. The Applicant did not request or obtain prior approval from FEMA, as required.

Headnote 2: 44 C.F.R. § 206.223(a)(3) states that for an applicant to be eligible for PA funding, it must be legally responsible for the work. The Applicant does not own any property within its boundaries and has not demonstrated legal responsibility for permanent repairs.

Headnote 3: The PAPPG states the applicant must demonstrate a widespread threat to the general public’s health and safety to receive funding for emergency protective measures on private property. The Applicant demonstrated a limited threat to certain private properties rather than a widespread threat to the general public’s health and safety.

Link: https://www.fema.gov/appeal/356211

New Law to Benefit Future eTexas Homeowners Following a Disaster

“After Harvey, some appraisal districts gave exemptions for damaged or destroyed homes, but others did not. House Bill 492 requires all appraisal districts to make an ad volorem…exemption after a disaster declared by the governor.”

Read More Here: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/neighborhood/bellaire/news/article/How-a-new-tax-law-may-benefit-Texas-homeowners-14953395.php?fbclid=IwAR2M0vseGn4LbmziWNlf-bb58d7_An4bC3yxBj1r-lxi1lN2s40RWcHIFjI

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog

Archives

  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015

Categories

  • Featured Interviews (3)
    • Mr. John Murphy (3)
  • General EM Law Topics (8)
  • InfoGraphics (1)
  • Legal Practice Areas (16)
    • Bankruptcy (1)
    • Federal Claims (3)
    • Insurance (7)
    • Legal Ethics (5)
    • Tax (1)
  • Non-Profits (1)
  • Notes (2)
  • Phases of Emergency Management (55)
    • Mitigation (11)
    • Preparedness (24)
    • Recovery (16)
    • Response (21)
  • Proposed Legislation (23)
    • Federal (12)
    • New York (1)
    • Oklahoma (1)
    • Texas (9)
  • Rulemaking (4)
    • Federal (2)
    • Texas (2)
  • Special Topics (29)
    • Body Cameras (1)
    • Department Management (1)
    • Drone/Unmanned Aircraft (3)
    • Ebola (1)
    • Emergency Medicine (2)
    • Employment (3)
    • Equipment (3)
    • Fire Department (1)
    • International (1)
    • Kids (2)
    • Marijuana Legalization (2)
    • NFPA 1600 (1)
    • Price Gouging (2)
    • Technology (6)
    • Volunteer Management (3)
  • Specific Hazards (17)
    • Natural Hazards (16)
      • Earthquakes (1)
      • Flooding (8)
      • Hurricane (3)
      • Tornados (6)
    • Technological Hazards (2)
      • HazMat (1)
  • Uncategorized (22)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog