logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog

Part 2 of 3: Talk to the Lawyer Before Something Bad Happens

We all have really good ideas sometimes, which is great. Innovation and improvisation is the way things get done in Emergency Management. However, Emergency Managers tend to be a one-person show, having many more things to do than time to do it. The important thing though is to involve the lawyers early. If done right, they can help you craft a plan, agreement, or strategy that is nearly bullet proof should something happens.

John shared a situation in Washington that he observed, which was luckily caught in time. At one point, if a firefighter was deployed in support of another agency fighting Wildfires, a question arose “who is financially responsible if the firefighter gets hurt?” Luckily, the lawyer got together and decided that if anything happened to a firefighter deployed in support of another agency’s emergency, the freighter would be covered under Washington State’s Worker’s Compensation program.

 

Impact on Emergency Management

An easy example of when Emergency Managers should talk to the lawyers is in mutual aid agreements. When you boil it down, mutual aid agreements are essential a contract between two or more government entities. Because of this, it is an extremely good idea to let the attorneys in on the process early to help craft the most effective agreement possible. The key is to not look at involvement of lawyers as a roadblock, but a protection. John stated that by having adequate legal counsel, Emergency Managers will ensure that plans and agreements can be made nearly bullet proof. Involvement early also helps preserve relationships by addressing issues early in agreements instead of waiting until they blow up into litigation later on.

« Sen. Schumer asks FCC to change law to allow Amtrak Police and Local Police to communicate
Texas House Advances Bill to Establish Regional Search and Rescue Teams »

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog

Archives

  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015

Categories

  • Featured Interviews (3)
    • Mr. John Murphy (3)
  • General EM Law Topics (8)
  • InfoGraphics (1)
  • Legal Practice Areas (16)
    • Bankruptcy (1)
    • Federal Claims (3)
    • Insurance (7)
    • Legal Ethics (5)
    • Tax (1)
  • Non-Profits (1)
  • Notes (2)
  • Phases of Emergency Management (55)
    • Mitigation (11)
    • Preparedness (24)
    • Recovery (16)
    • Response (21)
  • Proposed Legislation (23)
    • Federal (12)
    • New York (1)
    • Oklahoma (1)
    • Texas (9)
  • Rulemaking (4)
    • Federal (2)
    • Texas (2)
  • Special Topics (29)
    • Body Cameras (1)
    • Department Management (1)
    • Drone/Unmanned Aircraft (3)
    • Ebola (1)
    • Emergency Medicine (2)
    • Employment (3)
    • Equipment (3)
    • Fire Department (1)
    • International (1)
    • Kids (2)
    • Marijuana Legalization (2)
    • NFPA 1600 (1)
    • Price Gouging (2)
    • Technology (6)
    • Volunteer Management (3)
  • Specific Hazards (17)
    • Natural Hazards (16)
      • Earthquakes (1)
      • Flooding (8)
      • Hurricane (3)
      • Tornados (6)
    • Technological Hazards (2)
      • HazMat (1)
  • Uncategorized (22)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog